Raman Scattering and the LASER

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by Lloyd K on Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:10 am

Comments on http:// milesmathis. com/raman. pdf

That charge field strength isn't determined by the vacuum or by absolute zero, it is determined by the Sun's recycled field, and is therefore a result of our place in the galaxy and Solar System.

It still seems obvious to me that stars and planets store photons (not stationary, but moving at light speed in constant reflections/recyclings). In glass, photons go about 2/3 the speed of light. Right? Do they actually slow down, or do they go in small zigzags from bouncing off of atoms or recycling, giving them a longer path? Likewise, within planets and stars, photons do much more zigzagging, so it takes them thousands of years on average to exit the planet or star.

The nucleus is a big spinning engine, made up of many smaller fans, and it creates a real photon wind via a real and classical mechanics.

What's a little hard to believe is that photons are the fuel for these engines & fans & they're also the output, which is fuel for the next (or the same) engines and fans. How can fuel power an infinite series of engines & fans without being exhausted? Or do the photons gradually lose energy, as in the Compton effect?

Anyway, in both excitation and stimulated emission, the basic mechanism is a boost of the existing ambient charge field, already channeling through the nucleus.  When we introduce light, we are basically introducing new charge, since light and charge are the same thing: photons.  The boosted charge stream spins up the nucleus, which then spins up the entire charge stream.  In short, visible light spins up the IR photons in the ambient charge field to match its wavelength. If the channeled charge stream already matches its wavelength, due to prior boosting, then a LASER is created.  Since the existing stream has been pre-tuned to the incoming stream, the incoming stream can pass straight through the nucleus along the main channel, south pole to north, with no stepping up or down and therefore no interference.
_The proper substance is one where the nucleus has no carousel level, (meaning group one and two elements, in the simplest analysis).
_You just want your ambient charge field to be very rich in photons and very poor in antiphotons, and that can be achieved with a strong magnetic field of the right sort.  It is fairly easy to turn antiphotons into photons (flip them over), or to exclude antiphotons.

Does anyone know what Miles means by "visible light spins up the IR photons in the ambient charge field to match its wavelength"? I mean how exactly are the IR photons spun up?

(I've now started to read the Graphene paper, but I first went to review the methane paper, and I found this quote, which may help explain spinning up. I'm not sure it does, but it uses the term "spun up".)
It has been found that Carbon, although normally non-magnetic, can be very magnetic in some situations.  I would suggest that the varying nuclear make-up of different forms of Carbon explains this in the most direct and mechanical way.  It would appear that Carbon in compound with itself can re-arrange in the same way we saw it re-arranging in CO2, especially in an irradiated field or in long chains.  Once you have two prongs on each end of Carbon and only one alpha in the core, this will create a spun-up through charge, which is what causes magnetism.

Do you all agree that lasers and even spotlights or flashlights are proof that light is ballistic photons and not waves? If it were waves, such as sound waves, they would move out in all directsions. I read long ago, maybe in the 80s, that a laser aimed at the Moon from the Earth covers an area 2 miles in diameter on the Moon. I don't know if that's still the tightest beam they can make. I wonder if it spreads out because the IR from Earth goes through Earth's surface curvature, like a lens. If so, then a tighter beam might need to be made from a long rod in space containing period I and II elements. Right?

Lloyd K

Posts : 4
Join date : 2018-01-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by LongtimeAirman on Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:20 pm

.
Comments on http://milesmathis.com/raman.pdf

Miles wrote. That charge field strength isn't determined by the vacuum or by absolute zero, it is determined by the Sun's recycled field, and is therefore a result of our place in the galaxy and Solar System.
Lloyd wrote. It still seems obvious to me that stars and planets store photons (not stationary, but moving at light speed in constant reflections/recyclings). In glass, photons go about 2/3 the speed of light. Right? Do they actually slow down, or do they go in small zigzags from bouncing off of atoms or recycling, giving them a longer path? Likewise, within planets and stars, photons do much more zigzagging, so it takes them thousands of years on average to exit the planet or star.
Airman. I agree with you Lloyd. Miles is just taking the longer view. Despite the many tens of thousands, millions or even billions of years for photons to recycle through the planet, the question of whether Earth will continue to be the planet we know and love is determined primarily by Earth’s place in the galaxy and Solar System. The amount of charge channeled by the Earth will depend strictly on the amount of charge channeled through it by the Solar System in our corner of the galaxy.

Speed of light in a medium eh? I think I can give you a reasonable guess. Photon’s travel at c, that never changes, even inside the medium. You however, do not. How do you perceive light speed photons? You cannot, you may only view changes wrought by photon collisions, usually by means generated and received in that medium. So yes, any perceived signal depends on photon collisions. I believe the apparent slowdown is due to the time it takes the photon collision based signal to charge the medium, register photon collisions, then reflect collision rate changes within that medium. A Signal theory based on photon collisions and re-radiations saturating the medium. EMF examples abound.

I don’t recall Miles having talked about sound yet. Cr6 and I were on the subject lately. Feel free to critique anything I say. In the air, we can detect the presence or changes of mechanical energy – say two hands clapping - as the total number and spectra of atomic vibrations in the air around us, known as sound. The atomic vibrations themselves result from the presence and changes in the degree and number of photon collisions atoms receive from the emission fields of their neighbors within their local environ, composed of many overlapping emission fields. It takes time and many photon collisions for sound frequencies to emerge, a limitation imposed by the air medium, and our ability to detect changes within that medium, note that the photon has not slowed down.

Miles wrote. The nucleus is a big spinning engine, made up of many smaller fans, and it creates a real photon wind via a real and classical mechanics.
Lloyd wrote. What's a little hard to believe is that photons are the fuel for these engines & fans & they're also the output, which is fuel for the next (or the same) engines and fans. How can fuel power an infinite series of engines & fans without being exhausted? Or do the photons gradually lose energy, as in the Compton effect?
Airman. There is a real photon charge density differential between the poles and equator. Outside photons colliding with the particle are generally met with a light speed boundary when meeting a charged particle’s spinning equator, the charged particle’s photon emissions there are enough to drive off other charged particles; however, the least photon emission is at the charged particle’s poles, allowing incoming photons direct passage into the charged particle. That differential is what drives photon circulation through the charged particle. The charged particle is reacting to incoming photons, it will align to charge sources creating an emission plane orthogonal to the source photons.  

Lloyd wrote. Does anyone know what Miles means by "visible light spins up the IR photons in the ambient charge field to match its wavelength"? I mean how exactly are the IR photons spun up?
Airman. I think I do, consider the example of the Arabian definition of dawn. We have two threads, white or black, at night they look the same. Dawn is the moment when the visible wavelengths of light spin up the atoms of the threads enough to see the difference between the black or white threads photon emission fields. Different tuning (black or white) only becomes apparent when there is sufficient visible light to  allows us to discern the physical color difference.  

Cr6 and Nevyn both recently called attention to the fact that atoms, especially Carbon, have a wider variety of forms in response to varying charge channeling conditions than we had previously imagined.

Lloyd wrote. Do you all agree that lasers and even spotlights or flashlights are proof that light is ballistic photons and not waves? …
Airman. I must disagree. We use the simple notion of ballistic photons when referring to the resistive ability of the charged particle’s photon emission field. We also know that every photon is spinning, in every collision there is a spin component. In lasers and magnetic fields the spin direction is important, in spot lights or flashlights the spin direction is not important.
 
Lloyd wrote. … . If it were waves, such as sound waves, they would move out in all directions. I read long ago, maybe in the 80s, that a laser aimed at the Moon from the Earth covers an area 2 miles in diameter on the Moon. I don't know if that's still the tightest beam they can make. I wonder if it spreads out because the IR from Earth goes through Earth's surface curvature, like a lens. If so, then a tighter beam might need to be made from a long rod in space containing period I and II elements. Right?
Airman. Photons don’t bend in space, nor refract in a medium as far as I know. We see collections of photon collision events, where photons may be sent more or less coherently or in new directions.  It seems to me the tightest beam would be a single column of photons, no spreading except for the photon radius increase due to the photon’s gravity expansion.

Glad to hear from you Lloyd, I was afraid you'd given up on us.
.

LongtimeAirman
Admin

Posts : 654
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by Nevyn on Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:34 pm

Miles Mathis wrote:The nucleus is a big spinning engine, made up of many smaller fans, and it creates a real photon wind via a real and classical mechanics.

Lloyd wrote:What's a little hard to believe is that photons are the fuel for these engines & fans & they're also the output, which is fuel for the next (or the same) engines and fans. How can fuel power an infinite series of engines & fans without being exhausted? Or do the photons gradually lose energy, as in the Compton effect?

Why is that so hard to believe? All inputs become outputs. The exhaust of a car is used to expel what remains of the fuel after the engine has used it for its purposes. The fuel passes through the engine and gives it some energy, although in this case they can possibly be given energy instead. We are used to things like the internal combustion engine where the fuel is broken down to provide that energy but that is not always the case. Have a look into compressed air engines or turbines. They use the kinetic energy of the fuel rather than chemical energy by breaking bonds.

Miles Mathis wrote:Anyway, in both excitation and stimulated emission, the basic mechanism is a boost of the existing ambient charge field, already channeling through the nucleus.  When we introduce light, we are basically introducing new charge, since light and charge are the same thing: photons.  The boosted charge stream spins up the nucleus, which then spins up the entire charge stream.  In short, visible light spins up the IR photons in the ambient charge field to match its wavelength. If the channeled charge stream already matches its wavelength, due to prior boosting, then a LASER is created.  Since the existing stream has been pre-tuned to the incoming stream, the incoming stream can pass straight through the nucleus along the main channel, south pole to north, with no stepping up or down and therefore no interference.
_The proper substance is one where the nucleus has no carousel level, (meaning group one and two elements, in the simplest analysis).
_You just want your ambient charge field to be very rich in photons and very poor in antiphotons, and that can be achieved with a strong magnetic field of the right sort.  It is fairly easy to turn antiphotons into photons (flip them over), or to exclude antiphotons.

Lloyd wrote:Does anyone know what Miles means by "visible light spins up the IR photons in the ambient charge field to match its wavelength"? I mean how exactly are the IR photons spun up?

They are spun up because they now find themselves in a new field that has more energy that they do. The particles mingle together and have slight collisions (because they all have the same direction of motion) which averages the field. I imagine that the visible light photons get degraded a bit in the process as well. Maybe dropping a few Hz or something.
avatar
Nevyn
Admin

Posts : 860
Join date : 2014-09-11

View user profile http://www.nevyns-lab.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by Cr6 Yesterday at 2:45 am

Hey Lloyd...at some point it (matter) can't be "reduced" anymore. Miles (and us in most cases) are looking at this in terms of the smallest base building block that is the photon (size, frequency, path, spin direction, looping). It never stops and never goes away yet it does impart "energy" as hits on other things (molecules, atoms, elements, electrons, protons, neutrons, other photons...).  Are you looking for a live demo of the IR wave length matching? Working with Mathis and working with the standard theory is like dating two women... you can admire both but at some point you are going to have to hold hands and kiss with one of them in public -- that's the one you are going to go with -- you can't dance with both 'cause they'll both tear you apart between them.

The new paper has a few items related to photon spin:
http://www.milesmathis.com/electron.pdf

Cr6
Admin

Posts : 735
Join date : 2014-08-09

View user profile http://milesmathis.the-talk.net

Back to top Go down

Re: Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by Nevyn Yesterday at 5:23 pm

And now we have learnt something new about the universe...

Cr6 is a 'Player' Exclamation
avatar
Nevyn
Admin

Posts : 860
Join date : 2014-09-11

View user profile http://www.nevyns-lab.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Raman Scattering and the LASER

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum